![]() | Menu | ![]() |
(Task Force on Title IV Revisions)
Membership
| The Rt. Rev. Catherine Waynick, Chair | Indianapolis, V |
| Rev. George W. Brandt, Jr. | New York, II, resigned |
| Stephen F. Hutchinson, Esq. | Utah, VIII |
| Les Alvis, Esq. | Mississippi, IV |
| Duncan A. Bayne, Esq. | Olympia, VIII |
| The Rev. George W. Brandt, Jr. | New York, II |
| The Rev. Virginia Herring | North Carolina, IV |
| The Very Rev. Guy F. Lytle, III | Tennessee, IV |
| The Rev. Margo Maris | Minnesota, VI |
| The Rt. Rev. Wallis Ohl | Northwest Texas, VII |
| Ms. Woodi Sprinkle, LCSW | Virginia, III |
| Timothy Wittlinger, Esq. | Michigan, V, resigned |
| Consultants | |
| Sally Johnson, Esq. | |
| The Rev. F. Clayton Matthews | Bishop for the Office of Pastoral Development |
Task Force Representatives at General Convention
The Rt. Rev. Catherine Waynick, the Rt. Rev. Wallis Ohl, and Deputies Duncan Bayne, Esq., the Rev. Virginia Herring, and Stephen Hutchinson, Esq., are authorized to receive non-substantive amendments to this report.
Summary of Work
In 2000, the 73rd General Convention resolved that a Task Force should be formed and charged with the responsibility of researching the disciplinary policies and procedures of other churches and various professions, and to bring to the 75th Convention recommendations for the revision of Title IV (GC Resolution 2000–A028).
Background for 2000–A028
General Convention’s decision was initiated in response to concerns expressed from a variety of sources, especially the Standing Commission on Constitution and Canons (SCCC) and the Committee on Sexual Exploitation (COSE), each of which had conducted diocesan surveys in 1998 and 1999 to gain data regarding the use of Title IV. They had discovered that bishops and chancellors were often using a variety of informal ways to investigate complaints and settle disputes rather than enter the more lengthy litigious and potentially costly Title IV process. Based in civil and military codes of justice, the current canon does not have the scope, the flexibility, or the goal of bringing conflicted persons or groups to healing and reconciliation.
A clergy person accused under the current Title IV is caught up in a “win-lose” situation which often affects other persons, congregations, and in some cases, whole dioceses and the wider Church. There is no provision in the current Canon for a person with serious physical or emotional problems, an addiction, or other disabling condition which impairs ministry, to formally seek help and healing within a process which can lead to being restored to the exercise of ministry. The current Title IV is viewed as a punitive response to alleged misconduct, and not an articulation of healthy formation in the gospel values of our Baptismal Covenant.
Also expressed was a need to be able to hold lay members of the Church accountable in their formation and behavior in leadership and ministry roles in the community of faith. The current canon does not reflect our baptismal ecclesiology or offer specific guidance for lay persons who take on leadership and ministry roles in the Church.
For this reason, some bishops and chancellors have been using a variety of creative and effective responses to allegations of misbehavior, particularly of sexual misconduct, many of which have been incorporated into diocesan procedures. Even so, the role of the bishop is often ambiguous and multi-faceted, placing the bishop simultaneously in pastoral, investigative, and judicial roles. The goal in these cases is often to provide for outcomes which are not identified as values in the current Title IV: pastoral care for individuals and communities; healing of all concerned, restitution, forgiveness, and reconciliation. These diocesan policies have been viewed by many as “extra canonical,” but many of them speak to the values addressed in this proposal. Use of these diocesan policies substantially reduces the number of trials held under the current Title IV, even though there have been conflicts.
The Work of the Task Force
The Task Force determined to ground its work in theological reflection and prayer. We reflected upon Scripture, the historical teachings and liturgical and canonical life of the Church, and most particularly the ways in which these correspond to the teachings of Jesus about the kingdom of God. We enlisted the help of the Rev. Dr. Pamela Cooper-White, who took our own reflections and in turn a paper which has helped us to perceive the role and purpose of our Canons in new ways. Her paper, “Some Thoughts Toward Canon Revisions: Canons as Gift of Grace and Dance of Love,” was in our 2003 Blue Book Report (p. 355ff), and is available at: www.episcopalchurch.org/gc/ccab or along with other task force resources on the Diocese of Utah’s website: at www.episcopal-ut.org.
Cooper-White suggests that the canons can provide “expression of care for the ordering of the Church that is grounded not merely in restraint of evil (as is often the case in civil law), but focused on forming a community in which every member is supported in living a life grounded in desire for God, and the joy of being in harmony with the original goodness of God’s creation. This is the church’s earthly vocation, and the vocation of its ministers—who ultimately include all the baptized, ‘lay persons, bishops, priests and deacons.’ (BCP 855)” (2003 Blue Book, p. 357)
Seen in this way, the canons of the Church can provide not only structure for the maintenance, discipline, and good order in the Church, but a statement of expectation and a process to aid the formation of all our members in living out the faith. At the very least, our canons should reflect the teachings of Jesus and our own conviction that God’s desire for the Church is involvement in the holy enterprise of reconciliation.
Cooper-White describes the faithful community as providing and embodying the safe place in which truth-telling, healing, and reconciliation can occur. Such a community must surely hold all its members accountable, and particularly those in leadership positions. Holding all members, including laity, accountable for their part in the common life of the Church is not a new one. The Disciplinary Rubrics (BCP 409) provides a way to hold members accountable, but offers only one possible remedy—that of excommunication. The diocesan bishop must render an opinion on whether to uphold the decision to excommunicate, and no process for making that determination is described. Any options or outcomes in such cases depend entirely on the willingness of the individuals involved to accede to the bishop’s assumed authority. A common understanding of mutual accountability requires a canon which not only describes the expectations of lay persons in positions of responsibility, but a process for addressing instances of misconduct which is intended to lead to reconciliation. Les Alvis has provided a very helpful paper on this topic (see aforementioned websites).
The new canon proposed in this report reclaims the broader meaning of discipline as the developing of habits which can form all members of the Church in healthy and responsible ministries and which can produce reconciliation and healing when failures occur.
Producing the Draft Proposal
Exploration of the policies and procedures of other denominations and professional organizations continued into this triennium. As the work of drafting a proposed canon continued, members attended Provincial gatherings of clergy, bishops and chancellors; the House of Bishops; the National Network of Episcopal Clergy Association (NNECA); and other constituent groups, and posted the drafts on our website. We have gained useful feedback from these sources and have been able to incorporate much of it in the draft presented in this report.
Because this proposed canon is very different from the current canon in purpose, process, and scope, it may be difficult at first to envision how it can be implemented. For this reason we have enlisted the help of professional communicators, who have graciously offered their talents as a gift to this work, to help us produce materials which should be available to each Deputation well before Convention convenes. Task Force members will continue to be available to meet with groups in order to answer questions and receive feedback on this report.
I wish to express my deep gratitude to the members of the Task Force for their dedication to the ministry of producing this proposal for your consideration. The members have brought a wide range of experience and expertise, and the willingness to spend themselves in the accomplishment of this task has been truly remarkable. Our commitment to hold each other and the Church in prayer as our work continued has borne the fruit of what we trust will be a faithful and helpful contribution to the life of the Church. I acknowledge with special gratitude the work of our drafting team: Les Alvis, Duncan Bayne, Steve Hutchinson, Sally Johnson, Wallis Ohl, and Woodi Sprinkel.
I also wish to thank the members of Convention in advance for the effort which will be required to study this proposal and to give it due consideration. May our shared effort on behalf of the Church bring us closer to the goal of living what we say we believe: that we are engaged in the mission of reconciling all persons to God and each other in Christ Jesus.
Submitted with respect,
+Catherine M. Waynick, Bishop of Indianapolis
Budget Report
The budget for the work of the Task Force in this triennium was $60,000 and we completed our work within that budget. We realize that the education and training necessary for the implementation of a new disciplinary canon will require materials and travel expenses for those involved, and believe that a minimum allocation of $50,000 will be required for these purposes.
Resolution A152 Title IV Budget Appropriation
Resolved, the House of _____ concurring, That the General Convention request the Joint Standing Committee on Program, Budget and Finance to consider a budget allocation of $50,000 for the educational materials and training programs necessary to implement a revision of Title IV and that this program of education and training be administered by the Office of Pastoral Development of the House of Bishops.
Proposed Title IV Revisions
Resolution A153 Proposed Title IV Revisions1
Resolved, the House _____ of concurring, That the whole of Title IV, The Canons, be amended to read:
TITLE IV
FITNESS FOR MINISTRY, ACCOUNTABILITYAND ECCLESIASTICAL DISCIPLINE
CANON 1: Of Fitness for Ministry, Accountability and Ecclesiastical Discipline
By virtue of our Baptismal Covenant, all members of this Church are called to holiness of life and accountability to one another. The Church and each Diocese shall support their members in their life in Christ and shall hold each one accountable as provided in this Title.
CANON 2: Of Terminology Used in this Title
Except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires, as used in this Title the following terms and phrases shall have the following meanings:
Administrative Leave shall mean a restriction on Ministry in which the exercise of the Respondent's Ministry is suspended in its entirety during the period of the Administrative Leave and may include suspension from any ecclesiastical and related secular office.
Advisor shall mean a person designated to support, assist, consult with and advise a Complainant or Respondent in any matter of discipline under this Title as provided in Canon IV.19.10.
Bishop shall mean the Bishop of the Diocese or, if there be none, the Standing Committee or such other ecclesiastical authority established by the Constitution and Canons of the Diocese.
Church Attorney shall mean an attorney selected pursuant to diocesan canons to represent the Church in proceedings as provided in this Title. The Church Attorney shall perform all functions on behalf of the Church necessary to advance proceedings under this Title and shall have the following powers, in addition to the powers and duties otherwise provided in this Title: (a) to receive and review the Intake Officer's report and the reports of the Investigator and to determine, in the exercise of the Church Attorney's discretion, whether the reported information, if true, would be grounds for discipline or transfer to Impairment status; and (b) to exercise discretion consistent with this Title and the interests of the Church by declining to advance proceedings or by referring any matter back to the Intake Officer or the Bishop for pastoral response in lieu of disciplinary action. In representing the Church, the Church Attorney may consult with the Standing Committee.
Community shall mean (a) with regard to a Minister in Leadership, that part of the Church in which such Minister in Leadership performs his or her Ministry, such as a Diocese, Parish, Mission, school, seminary, hospital, camp or any similar institution, or (b) with regard to a Minister other than a Minister in Leadership, the Parish or Mission where the Minister participates in Worship or other Ministry.
Complainant shall mean (a) the person or persons from whom the Intake Officer receives information concerning an Offense or Impairment and (b) any Injured Person designated by the Bishop who, in the Bishop's discretion, should be afforded the status of a Complainant, provided, however, that any Injured Person so designated may decline such designation.
Conciliator shall mean a person appointed to seek the resolution of a matter under Canon IV .9.
Conference Panel shall mean a panel of three members of the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board selected by the president of the board, to serve as the body before which an informal conference is held as provided in Canon IV.11, provided, however, that no such member may serve as a member of the Hearing Panel in the same case.
Covenant shall mean (a) in the case of conciliation, a written resolution of the matter which is negotiated and agreed between the Complainant and the Respondent or (b) in the case of an Conference Panel proceeding, a written resolution which is negotiated and agreed between the Conference Panel, the Church Attorney and the Respondent. All Covenants shall meet the requirements of Canon IV.13.
Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board shall mean the body provided for in Canon IV.5.1.
Discipline of this Church shall be found in the Constitution, the Canons, and the Rubrics and the Ordinal of the Book of Common Prayer.
Doctrine shall mean the basic and essential teachings of the Church and is to be found in the Canon of Holy Scripture as understood in the Apostles and Nicene Creeds and in the sacramental rites, the Ordinal and Catechism of the Book of Common Prayer.
Hearing Panel shall mean a panel of three members of the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board selected by the president of the Board, to serve as the body before which a hearing is held as provided in Canon IV.12, provided, however, that no such member may serve as a member of the Conference Panel in the same case.
Impairment shall mean (a) any physical, emotional, spiritual, or mental condition of such nature as to render a Minister in Leadership incapable of managing himself or herself with the integrity and competency requisite for the particular Ministry in which such Minister in Leadership is engaged or (b) any habitual use of or clinical addiction to alcohol, drugs or any other substance or activity which impairs or tends to impair the ability of a Minister in Leadership competently to perform the particular Ministry in which such Minister in Leadership is engaged.
Injured Person shall mean a person, group or Community who has been, is, or may be affected by an Offense or Impairment.
Intake Officer shall mean a person designated by the Bishop, after consultation with the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board, to whom information regarding Offenses or Impairments is reported.
Investigator shall mean a person having (a) sufficient knowledge, skill, experience, training and, where required by law, licensure, to conduct investigations under this Title and (b) familiarity with the provisions and objectives of this Title. Investigators shall be appointed by the Bishop in consultation with the president of the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board.
Member of the Clergy shall mean bishops, priests and deacons of this Church.
Minister shall mean, consistent with the Catechism in the Book of Common Prayer, (a) any lay person who is an adult member of this Church within the meaning of Canon I.17 and (b) any Member of the Clergy.
Minister in Leadership shall mean (a) any Member of the Clergy or (b) any nominee, postulant, or candidate in the ordination process or (c) any Minister other than a Member of the Clergy who has accepted a Ministry in this Church or in the Community.
Ministry shall mean (a) in the case of a Member of the Clergy, the office to which he or she is ordained; or (b) in the case of any other Minister in Leadership, responsibility for oversight, pastoral care, leadership, teaching, instruction or supervision entrusted to him or her by this Church.
Offense shall mean any act or omission for which a Minister may be held accountable under Canons IV.3 or IV.4.
Order shall mean (a) a written decision of a Conference Panel or a Hearing Panel which is issued with or without the Respondent's consent or (b) written terms of discipline agreed between the Respondent and the Bishop and approved as provided in Canon IV.14.
Pastoral Direction shall mean a written direction given by a Bishop to a Minister in Leadership which meets the requirements of Canon IV.7.
Pastoral Relationship shall mean any relationship between a Minister in Leadership and any person to whom the Minister in Leadership provides or has provided counseling, pastoral care, spiritual direction or guidance, regular ministration of any sacrament, or from whom such Minister in Leadership has received information within the Rite of Reconciliation of a Penitent.
Privileged Communication shall mean any communication or disclosure made in confidence and with an expectation of privacy (a) within the Rite of Reconciliation of a Penitent; (b) between a client and the client's attorney; (c) between a Respondent and an Advisor or a Complainant and an Advisor; (d) between spouses or same-sex partners; or (e) between and among a Conciliator and participants in a conciliation under Canon IV.9.
Provincial Court of Review shall mean a court organized and existing as provided in Canon IV.5.4 to serve as the body which performs the duties prescribed in Canon IV.15.
Reference Panel shall mean a panel composed of the Intake Officer, the Bishop and the president of the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board to serve as the body which performs the duties prescribed in Canons IV.6 and IV.10.
Respondent shall mean any Minister (a) who is the subject of a matter referred for conciliation or to the Conference Panel or to the Hearing Panel; (b) whose Ministry has been restricted; (c) who has been placed on Administrative Leave; (d) who is the subject of an investigation and is asked by an Investigator to provide information or to make a statement; or (e) who agreed with the Bishop regarding terms of discipline pursuant to Canon IV.14.
Sentence shall mean the pronouncement of discipline of a Member of the Clergy pursuant to a Covenant or Order in the form of (a) suspension, in which such Member of the Clergy is required to temporarily refrain from the exercise of the gifts of Ministry conferred by ordination, or (b) deposition, in which such Member of the Clergy is deprived of the right to exercise the gifts and spiritual authority of God(s word and sacraments conferred at ordination.
Sexual Abuse shall mean any Sexual Behavior at the request of, acquiesced to, or by a person eighteen years of age or older and a person under eighteen years of age, in high school, or legally incompetent.
Sexual Behavior shall mean any physical contact, bodily movement, speech, communication or other activity sexual in nature or that is intended to arouse or gratify erotic interest or sexual desires.
Sexual Misconduct shall mean (a) Sexual Abuse, or (b) Sexual Behavior at the request of, acquiesced to, or by a Minister in Leadership and a person, other than his or her spouse or same-sex partner, with whom the Minister in Leadership has a Pastoral Relationship, or (c) unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature by a Minister in Leadership when submission to or rejection of this conduct explicitly or implicitly affects an individual(s work, volunteer, Ministry or educational performance, or creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive work, volunteer, Ministry, or educational environment.
CANON 3: Of Accountability
Sec. 1 A Minister shall be subject to proceedings under this Title for:
Sec. 2 A Minister in Leadership shall be accountable for any breach of the Standards of Conduct set forth in Canon IV.4.
Sec. 3 In order for any conduct or condition to be the subject of the provisions of this Title, the Offense or Impairment complained of must violate applicable provisions of Canon IV.3 or IV.4 and must be material and substantial or of clear and weighty importance to the ministry of this Church.
Sec. 4 The provisions of this Title do not replace or restrict the Disciplinary Rubrics of the Book of Common Prayer but are supplementary thereto as provided in Canon I.17.6.
CANON 4: Of Standards of Conduct
Sec. 1 In exercising his or her Ministry, a Minister in Leadership shall:
Sec. 2 A Minister in Leadership, whether exercising his or her Ministry or not, shall refrain from:
CANON 5: Of Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Structures
Sec. 1 Each Diocese shall, by Canon, create a court to be known as the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board as described in this Canon. Each such Board shall consist of not less than nine persons to be selected as determined by Diocesan Canon. The membership of each Board shall include lay persons and priests or deacons, and the majority of the Board members shall be priests or deacons, but by no more than one. Within sixty days following each Diocesan Convention, the Board shall convene to elect a president for the following year, unless another method for selection of the president is provided by Diocesan Canon.
Sec. 2 The provisions of Canon IV.19 shall apply to all Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Boards.
Sec. 3 The following rules shall govern the operations of all Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Boards:
Sec. 4 In each Province there shall be a court to be known as the Provincial Court of Review, with jurisdiction to receive and determine appeals from Hearing Panels of dioceses within the Province as provided in Canon IV.15 and to determine venue issues as provided in Canon IV.19.5.
CANON 6: Of Intake and Referral of Information Concerning Offenses and Impairments
Sec. 1 Each Diocese shall provide for and publicize methods and means of reporting information concerning Offenses and Impairments.
Sec. 2 Information concerning Offenses or Impairments may be submitted to the Intake Officer in any manner and in any form.
Sec. 3 Any Minister in Leadership other than the Intake Officer who receives information regarding an Offense or Impairment shall promptly forward the information to the Intake Officer.
Sec. 4 Upon receipt of such information, the Intake Officer shall incorporate the information into a written intake report, including as much specificity as possible. The Intake Officer shall provide copies of the intake report to the other members of the Reference Panel.
Sec. 5 If the Intake Officer determines that the information, if true, would not constitute an Offense or Impairment, the Intake Officer shall dismiss the matter. The Complainant may appeal, in writing, the decision of dismissal to the president of the Discipline and Fitness Board. The Intake Officer shall provide written notice to the Complainant, the subject Minister and the Bishop of the decision of dismissal, the reason therefor, and the Complainant's right to appeal the decision within thirty days of the date of the notice.
Sec. 6 In the event of an appeal of a dismissal, the president of the Discipline and Fitness Board shall, within thirty days of the receipt of the appeal, review the intake report and either affirm or overrule the dismissal. The president shall promptly notify the Complainant, the subject Minister, the Intake Officer, and the Bishop of the decision. If the decision is to overrule the dismissal, the president shall refer the intake report to the Reference Panel.
Sec. 7 If the Intake Officer determines that the information, if true, would constitute an Offense or Impairment, the Intake Officer shall promptly forward the report to the Reference Panel appointed in the matter. The president shall promptly select from the Discipline and Fitness Board, by lot or by other random means, a Conference Panel and a Hearing Panel, and shall designate a president of each Panel. Each Panel shall consist of not less than three persons and shall include both clergy and lay members. The president shall be ineligible to serve on either Panel.
Sec. 8 The Reference Panel shall meet as soon as possible after receiving the intake report to determine how to refer the report. Referral options are (a) no action required other than appropriate pastoral response pursuant to Canon IV.8; (b) conciliation pursuant to Canon IV.9; (c) investigation pursuant to Canon IV.10 or (d) referral for possible agreement with the Bishop regarding terms of discipline pursuant to Canon IV.14. Referral decisions shall require the approval of a majority of the Reference Panel.
Sec. 9 If the determination of the Reference Panel is to take no action other than an appropriate pastoral response, the Panel shall notify the Complainant and the subject Minister of the determination and the basis for the determination to take no action other than an appropriate pastoral response. If the referral is to conciliation, the provisions of Canon IV.9 shall apply. If the referral is to investigation, the provisions of Canon IV.10 shall apply.
Sec. 10 In the event of any appeal to the Bishop as provided in Canon I.17.6 by any member of this Church who has been refused any Sacrament of the Church or who has been repelled from the Holy Communion under the rubrics or who has been informed of an intention to refuse or repel him or her from the Holy Communion under the rubrics, the Bishop shall promptly notify the Intake Officer of such appeal and the matter shall then proceed as a case of discipline in accordance with this Title. In such case, the Member of the Clergy who so refused, repelled or informed shall be designated as the Complainant and the member of the Church shall be designated as the Respondent; provided, however, that the Bishop shall have discretion to restore the member of the Church to the Holy Communion of the Bishop's own accord at any time prior to the referral of the matter as provided in Canon IV.11.8, in which event the proceedings under this Title shall be terminated.
Sec. 11 All communications and deliberations during the intake and referral stages shall be confidential except as the Bishop deems to be pastorally appropriate or as required by law.
CANON 7: Of Pastoral Direction, Restricted Ministry and Administrative Leave
Sec. 1 At any time the Bishop may issue a Pastoral Direction to a Minister in Leadership who is, in the case of a Member of the Clergy, canonically resident, actually resident, or licensed in the Diocese, or in the case of any other Minister in Leadership, a member of the Diocese.
Sec. 2 A Pastoral Direction must (a) be made in writing; (b) set forth clearly the reasons for the Pastoral Direction; (c) set forth clearly what is required of the Minister in Leadership; (d) be issued in the Bishop(s capacity as the pastor, teacher and overseer of the Minister in Leadership; (e) be neither capricious nor arbitrary in nature nor in any way contrary to the Constitution and Canons of the Church, both national and diocesan; and (f) be directed to some matter which concerns the Doctrine, Discipline of this Church or Worship of this Church or the manner of life and behavior of the Minister in Leadership concerned; and (g) be promptly served upon the Minister in Leadership.
Sec. 3 If at any time the Bishop determines that a Minister in Leadership may have committed any Offense or may have Impairment, or that the good order, welfare or safety of the Church or any Community may be threatened, the Bishop may, without prior notice or hearing, (a) place restrictions upon the exercise of the Ministry of such Minister in Leadership or (b) place such Minister in Leadership on Administrative Leave.
Sec. 4 Any restriction on Ministry imposed pursuant to Canon IV.7.3(a) must (a) be made in writing; (b) set forth clearly the reasons for imposition of the restriction; (c) set forth clearly what limitations are placed upon the exercise of the Ministry of the Minister in Leadership and the duration thereof; (d) be neither capricious nor arbitrary in nature nor in any way contrary to the Constitution and Canons of the Church, both national and diocesan; (e) be promptly served upon the Minister in Leadership; and (f) advise the Minister in Leadership of his or her right to be heard in the matter of the restriction as provided in this Canon. A copy of such writing shall be promptly provided to the Church Attorney.
Sec. 5 Any placement of a Minister in Leadership on Administrative Leave pursuant to Canon IV.7.3(b) must (a) be made in writing; (b) set forth clearly the reasons for placement of the Minister in Leadership on Administrative Leave; (c) set forth the conditions and duration of the Administrative Leave; (d) be neither capricious nor arbitrary in nature nor in any way contrary to the Constitution and Canons of the Church, both national and diocesan; (e) be promptly served upon the Minister in Leadership; and (f) advise the Minister in Leadership of his or her right to be heard in the matter of the Administrative Leave as provided in this Canon. A copy of such writing shall be promptly provided to the Church Attorney.
Sec. 6 The duration of restriction on Ministry or Administrative Leave may be for a stated period or to continue until the occurrence of a specified event or the satisfaction of a specified condition.
Sec. 7 Pastoral Directions, restrictions on Ministry, and Administrative Leaves may be issued and imposed in any chronological order and may be issued and imposed concurrently.
Sec. 8 Any Pastoral Direction, restriction on Ministry, or Administrative Leave under this Canon shall be effective upon delivery of the writing setting it forth to the subject Member of the Clergy or Minister in Leadership or by communication to the subject Member of the Clergy or Minister in Leadership of the contents of such writing. If delivery of such writing is refused, the Pastoral Direction, restrictions on Ministry, or Administrative Leave, as the case may be, shall be binding upon such refusal.
Sec. 9 If imposition of restriction on Ministry or placement on Administrative Leave occurs prior to the receipt of information by the Intake Officer, as provided in Canon IV.6, then the Bishop may forward a copy of the writing setting forth the restriction or Administrative Leave to the Intake Officer, who shall receive such information as a report of an Offense or Impairment and proceed as provided in Canon IV.6.
Sec. 10 The Bishop may disclose such information concerning any Pastoral Direction, restriction on Ministry, or Administrative Leave as the Bishop deems pastorally appropriate or as necessary to seek or obtain diocesan authority for resolution of the matter or any part thereof.
Sec. 11 Every imposition of restriction on Ministry and placement on Administrative Leave shall be subject to review upon the request of the Minister in Leadership at any time in the duration thereof. A request for review must be in writing and addressed to the president of the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board and the Church Attorney. A Minister in Leadership who requests review shall become a Respondent under this Title. Reviews shall be conducted within fifteen days of the delivery of the request for review to the president of the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board, unless extended by consent of the Respondent.
Sec. 12 If a request for review of restriction on Ministry or Administrative Leave is made prior to referral to the Conference Panel, then the review shall be conducted by the Conference Panel. If a request for review of restriction on Ministry or Administrative Leave is made subsequent to referral to the Conference Panel but prior to referral to the Hearing Panel, the review shall be conducted by the Conference Panel. If a request for review of restriction on Ministry or Administrative Leave is made subsequent to referral to the Hearing Panel, the review shall be conducted by the Hearing Panel. The question before a Panel reviewing a restriction on Ministry or Administrative Leave is whether, at the time of the review and based upon information then available to the Panel, the restrictions on Ministry or Administrative Leave and the terms and conditions thereof are warranted. The review may be conducted either personally or telephonically. The Intake Officer, the Respondent or the Respondent's Advisor or both, the Bishop, the Chancellor and the Church Attorney shall each be afforded the opportunity to be present, either personally or telephonically, at the review, and any such person present shall be heard by the Panel if such person desires to be heard. The Panel may hear from other persons at the Panel's discretion.
Sec. 13 After conducting the review and hearing from such persons designated in Canon IV.7.11 as desire to be heard, the Panel shall confer privately and make a determination to (a) dissolve the restriction on Ministry or Administrative Leave; (b) affirm the restriction on Ministry or Administrative Leave and the terms and conditions thereof; or (c) affirm the restriction on Ministry or Administrative Leave but with modification of the terms and conditions thereof. The Panel's determination shall be in writing and shall be delivered to the Respondent, the Church Attorney, the Bishop and the Intake Officer, and shall be binding in the same manner as provided in Canon IV.7.8. In the event of the dissolution of the restriction on Ministry or Administrative Leave, the Bishop may give notice thereof to such persons and Communities having notice of the restriction on Ministry or Administrative Leave as the Bishop deems appropriate.
Sec. 14 Any Covenant or Order resulting from Canons IV.11 or IV.12, unless otherwise specified, shall supersede any restriction on Ministry or Administrative Leave then in effect.
CANON 8: Of Pastoral Response
Sec. 1 The Bishop shall provide for appropriate pastoral response whenever any report is made to the Intake Officer. Such pastoral response shall embody respect, care, and concern for affected persons and Communities. The response shall be designed so as to promote healing, repentance, forgiveness, restitution, justice, amendment of life and reconciliation among all involved or affected.
Sec. 2 In each pastoral response the Bishop shall consider offering pastoral care to all those affected by the Offense or Impairment or allegations thereof. Pastoral care shall be considered for the Complainant, the Complainant's family, the Respondent, the Respondent's family, Injured Persons, Injured Persons( families, any Community, Ministers in Leadership, witnesses, and the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board.
Sec. 3 The exact nature of the pastoral care offered shall be determined for each case and may include counseling, referral for spiritual direction and referral for consultation.
Sec. 4 In every case, and notwithstanding any other provision of this Title to the contrary, the Bishop may disclose such information concerning any Offense or Impairment or allegations thereof or concerning any Covenant or Order as the Bishop deems pastorally appropriate.
Sec. 5 The Bishop shall give consideration to the respective privacy interests and pastoral needs of all affected persons.
Sec. 6 The Bishop may designate a person to be responsible for the implementation of the pastoral response. Such person may be the Intake Officer. The duties of such person may include coordination of pastoral care and coordination of communications between the Bishop and Advisors.
CANON 9: Of Conciliation
Sec. 1 Conciliation shall seek a resolution which promotes healing, repentance, forgiveness, restitution, justice, amendment of life and reconciliation among the Complainant, Respondent, affected Community, other persons and the Church.
Sec. 2 Where a matter is referred for conciliation, the Bishop shall appoint a Conciliator to assist the Complainant, Respondent, other affected persons and the Church in reconciling. The Bishop or a representative appointed by the Bishop may participate in the conciliation.
Sec. 3 If the conciliation is successful, a Covenant will be prepared as provided in Canon IV.13. If conciliation cannot be achieved within a reasonable time, the Conciliator will report such to the Bishop, and the matter will be referred back to the Reference Panel.
Sec. 4 A Conciliator shall be a person trained in dispute resolution techniques and without conflict of interest in the matter. All communications between the Complainant and the Conciliator, the Respondent and the Conciliator, and other participants in the conciliation and the Conciliator shall be confidential except as the Conciliator may have the permission of the respective person to disclose the information to the other participants in the conciliation in order to promote efforts towards conciliation.
CANON 10: Of Investigations
Sec. 1 In each Diocese there shall be one or more Investigators.
Sec. 2 Upon referral of an intake report, the Investigator shall investigate all facts pertinent to the factual claims of the intake report. The Investigator shall use appropriate investigative means, with due consideration to pastoral sensitivities, and shall complete the investigation as expeditiously as possible.
Sec. 3 The Investigator shall present the findings of the investigation in writing to the Reference Panel. The Reference Panel may meet with the Investigator and shall consider the report to determine whether to (a) take no action other than an appropriate pastoral responses pursuant to Canon IV.8; (b) refer the matter to the Bishop for consideration of proceedings under Canon IV.14; (c) refer the matter to conciliation pursuant to Canon IV.9; (d) require further investigation; or (e) refer the matter to the Conference Panel pursuant to Canon IV.11. The determination shall be approved by a majority vote of the Reference Panel.
Sec. 4 If the determination is to refer for further investigation, the Investigator shall make such further investigation as the Reference Panel directs and shall submit a supplemental report of findings to the Reference Panel. The Reference Panel shall then reconvene and proceed as provided in Canon IV.7.3.
Sec. 5 All investigations shall be confidential, and all persons contacted by the Investigator shall be advised of the confidential nature of the investigation.
CANON 11: Of Conference Panels
Sec. 1 Upon referral of a matter to a Conference Panel, the president of the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board shall forward to the Church Attorney the intake report, all of the Investigator(s reports, and any other writings or other file materials created or collected during the intake, investigative or referral process. From this material the Church Attorney shall prepare a written statement, describing each alleged Offense or Impairment separately, with reasonable particularity sufficient to apprise the Respondent of the acts, omissions or conditions which are the subject of the proceedings. The Church Attorney shall then forward the materials received from the president of the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board, together with the written statement, to the Conference Panel.
Sec. 2 The Conference Panel shall review the materials provided to determine who, in addition to those listed in Canon IV.11.3, should be invited to participate in the proceeding before the Conference Panel in order to promote the purposes of this Title. Such may include, for example, the Investigator, family members, representatives of the affected Community, or other affected persons.
Sec. 3 The Conference Panel shall issue a notice to the Respondent, the Respondent's Advisor, the Complainant, the Complainant's Advisor, the Investigator, and such other persons, if any, as the Conference Panel in its discretion may determine. The notice shall describe the nature and purpose of the proceeding, contain a copy of the written statement prepared by the Church Attorney, shall disclose the names of all persons to whom the notice is sent, and shall establish a date, time and place at which the Respondent is to appear before the Conference Panel.
Sec. 4 The Respondent shall attend the conference.
Sec. 5 The Church Attorney shall attend the conference, shall represent the Church and shall be heard by the Conference Panel.
Sec. 6 The Complainant may attend the conference but may not be required to do so. The Complainant's Advisor may attend the conference regardless of whether the Complainant attends.
Sec. 7 The proceedings of the Conference Panel shall be informal and conversational. The Conference Panel shall describe the alleged Offense or Impairment to the Respondent. The Conference Panel shall hear from the Complainant or the Complainant's Advisor or both, if either or both are present, and from the Respondent or the Respondent's Advisor or both. At its discretion, the Conference Panel may hear from the Investigator or any other persons present. At its discretion, the Conference Panel may confer with any participants outside the presence of the other participants.
Sec. 8 No witnesses shall be called to testify at the proceedings before the Conference Panel. No record of the proceedings of the Conference Panel shall be made. The conference shall be closed to all except the members of the Conference Panel, and invited participants. Proceedings before the Conference Panel shall be confidential except as may be provided in an Order or Covenant or as provided elsewhere in this Title.
Sec. 9 A Covenant may be entered into at a proceeding before the Conference Panel. If a Covenant is not entered into, the Conference Panel shall confer privately to reach a determination of the matter, which may include (a) dismissal of the matter; (b) referral for conciliation; (c) referral to the Hearing Panel; or (d) issuance of an Order.
Sec. 10 If the determination is to dismiss the matter, the Conference Panel shall issue an Order which shall include the reasons for dismissal and which may contain findings exonerating the Respondent. A copy of the Order shall be provided to the Bishop, the Respondent, the Respondent's Advisor, the Complainant, the Complainant's Advisor, and the Church Attorney.
Sec. 11 If the resolution is the entry of a Covenant or the issuance of an Order other than an Order of dismissal, the provisions of Canon IV.13 shall apply.
Sec. 12 The Respondent or the Church Attorney may refuse an Order issued by the Conference Panel by giving written notice of the refusal to the president of the Conference Panel within fifteen days following the effective date of the Order as defined in Canon IV.13.10. Upon receipt of the notice of refusal, the president of the Conference Panel shall notify the president of the Discipline and Fitness Board of the refusal.
CANON 12: Of Hearing Panels
Sec. 1 If a matter is referred to the Hearing Panel, the president of the Conference Panel shall promptly notify the president of the Discipline and Fitness Board of the referral.
Sec. 2 Upon receipt of a referral for Hearing Panel proceedings, the Church Attorney shall review all information acquired as of the time of such referral and, if necessary, shall revise or update the written statement of the Offense or Impairment and shall provide the same to the Hearing Panel. The Hearing Panel shall issue a notice to the Respondent, to the Respondent's Advisor, and to the Church Attorney.
Sec. 3 In all proceedings before the Hearing Panel, the Church Attorney shall appear on behalf of the Diocese, which shall then be considered the party on one side and the Respondent the party on the other. Each Complainant shall be entitled to be present throughout and observe the Hearing and each may be accompanied by another person of his or her own choosing in addition to his or her Advisor.
Sec. 4 All proceedings before the Hearing Panel, except its private deliberations, shall be public, provided, however, that the Hearing Panel may close any part of the proceedings at its discretion to protect the privacy of any person. A record of the hearing shall be made by such means as to enable the creation of a written transcript of the hearing.
Sec. 5 The Church Attorney and the Respondent shall each be afforded reasonable time and opportunity to prepare evidence for the hearing as follows:
Sec. 6 In all proceedings of the Hearing Panel the testimony of witnesses shall be taken orally and personally or by such other means as provided by order of the Hearing Panel. All testimony shall be given under oath or solemn affirmation and be subject to cross-examination. The proceedings shall be conducted as follows:
Sec. 7 Following the conclusion of the hearing, the Hearing Panel shall confer privately to reach a determination of the matter by (a) dismissal of the matter or (b) issuance of an Order.
Sec. 8 If the determination is to dismiss the matter, the Hearing Panel shall issue an Order which shall include the reasons for dismissal and which may contain findings exonerating the Respondent. A copy of the Order shall be provided to the Bishop, the Respondent, the Respondent's Advisor, the Complainant, the Complainant's Advisor, and the Church Attorney.
Sec. 9 If the resolution is the issuance of an Order other than an Order of dismissal, the provisions of Canon IV.13 shall apply.
CANON 13: Of Covenants and Orders
Sec. 1 A Covenant may (a) provide any terms which promote healing, repentance, forgiveness, restitution, justice, amendment of life and reconciliation among the Complainant, Respondent, affected Community and other persons; (b) place restrictions on the Respondent(s exercise of Ministry, (c) place the Respondent on probation; (d) recommend to the Bishop that the Respondent, if a Member of the Clergy, be suspended or deposed from Ministry; (e) remove the Respondent, if a lay person, from Ministry; (f) limit the involvement, attendance or participation of the Respondent in the Community; or (g) any combination of the foregoing. A Covenant may be conditioned on the Bishop imposing any recommended suspension, deposition or conditions for restoration to Ministry for a Member of the Clergy. A Covenant providing for suspension of a Member of the Clergy from Ministry shall specify on what terms or conditions and at what time the suspension shall cease. A Covenant providing for removal of a lay person from Ministry may include conditions for reinstatement. Any Covenant providing for limitation upon the involvement, attendance or participation of the Respondent in the Community shall also provide conditions for restoration.
Sec. 2 If a Covenant results from a Conciliation, the Covenant shall be signed by the Complainant, the Respondent and the Conciliator, provided that the Conciliator shall sign last.
Sec. 3 If a Covenant results from proceedings before a Conference Panel or a Hearing Panel, the Complainant and the Complainant(s Advisor shall have first been afforded an opportunity to be heard by the Panel regarding the proposed terms of the Covenant. The Covenant shall be signed by the Respondent, the Church Attorney and the president of the Panel, provided that the president shall sign last.
Sec. 4 A copy of the Covenant shall be sent to the Complainant, the Complainant's Advisor, the Respondent, the Respondent's Advisor, the Church Attorney, and the Bishop by the Conciliator or the president of the Conference Panel or Hearing Panel (whichever the matter was before when the Covenant was reached) on the date that the Conciliator or president of the Panel signs the Covenant.
Sec. 5 If a Covenant recommends that the Respondent, if a Member of the Clergy, be suspended or deposed from Ministry, the Bishop shall have fifteen days from the date on which the Covenant is sent to the Bishop in which to advise in writing the Respondent, the Respondent's Advisor, the Complainant, the Complainant's Advisor, the Church Attorney, and the Conciliator or the president of the Conference Panel or Hearing Panel whether the Bishop will pronounce the Sentence as recommended. The Bishop shall advise that he or she will (a) pronounce the Sentence as recommended or (b) pronounce a lesser Sentence than that recommended. The Bishop shall pronounce Sentence not sooner than thirty days following the date on which the Covenant is sent to the Bishop and not later than sixty days following such date. The Bishop's pronouncement of a lesser Sentence than that recommended shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of the Covenant.
Sec. 6 An Order issued by a Conference Panel or Hearing Panel may (a) provide any terms which promote healing, repentance, forgiveness, restitution, justice, amendment of life and reconciliation among the Complainant, Respondent, affected Community and other persons; (b) place restrictions on the Respondent(s exercise of Ministry, (c) place the Respondent on probation; (d) recommend to the Bishop that the Respondent, if a Member of the Clergy, be suspended or deposed from Ministry; (e) temporarily or permanently remove the Respondent, if a lay person, from any Ministry; (f) limit the involvement, attendance or participation of the Respondent in the Community; or (g) any combination of the foregoing. An Order providing for suspension of a Member of the Clergy from Ministry shall specify on what terms or conditions and at what time the suspension shall cease. An Order providing for removal of a lay person from Ministry may include conditions for reinstatement. Any Order providing for limitation upon the involvement, attendance or participation of the Respondent in the Community shall also provide conditions for restoration.
Sec. 7 Prior to the issuance of an Order by a Conference Panel or a Hearing Panel, the issuing Panel shall afford the Bishop and the Complainant each with an opportunity to be heard on the proposed terms of the Order.
Sec. 8 If an Order recommends that the Respondent, if a Member of the Clergy, be suspended or deposed from Ministry, the Bishop shall have fifteen days from the date of the issuance of the Order in which to advise in writing the Respondent, the Respondent's Advisor, the Complainant, the Complainant's Advisor, the Church Attorney, and the president of the Conference Panel or Hearing Panel (whichever Panel issued the Order) whether the Bishop will pronounce the Sentence as recommended. The Bishop shall advise that he or she will (a) pronounce the Sentence as recommended or (b) pronounce a lesser Sentence than that recommended. The Bishop shall pronounce Sentence not sooner than thirty days following the issuance of the Order and not later than sixty days following the issuance of the Order. Notwithstanding anything in this section to the contrary, no Sentence shall be pronounced while an appeal of the matter is pending. However, the Bishop may, while an appeal is pending, place restrictions upon the exercise of the Respondent's Ministry, or place the Respondent on Administrative Leave, or continue any such restriction or Administrative Leave as was in effect at the time of the issuance of the Order. The Bishop's pronouncement of a lesser Sentence than that recommended in an Order shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of the Order.
Sec. 9 A Covenant or Order shall include, in addition to such terms and provisions as are consistent with Canons IV.13.1 and IV.13.6, (a) the name of the Respondent, (b) a reference to the Canon(s), section(s) and subsection(s) specifying the Offense or Impairment and (c) general information regarding the Offense or Impairment sufficient to afford protection from proceedings which are barred under Canon IV.19.13.
Sec. 10 A Covenant is effective when it is signed by the Conciliator or the president of the Panel, except that if a Covenant recommends that the Respondent, if a Member of the Clergy, be suspended or deposed from Ministry, that part of the Covenant shall be effective fifteen days following the date on which the Covenant is signed by the Conciliator or the president of the Panel. An Order is effective when it is issued, except that if an Order recommends that the Respondent, if a Member of the Clergy, be suspended or deposed from Ministry, that part of the Order shall be effective fifteen days following the date on which the Order is issued.
Sec. 11 If the Order is issued by a Conference Panel or by the Bishop in a matter which is before the Conference Panel, the Respondent may refuse the Order in the same manner as provided in Canon IV.11.12 and the matter shall be referred to a Hearing Panel for hearing as provided in Canon IV.12.
Sec. 12 Notice of Covenants and Orders which shall have become effective shall be given without delay as follows:
CANON 14: Of Agreements Between Bishops and Respondents for Discipline
Sec. 1 At any time before an Order becomes effective, the Respondent or any Minister in Leadership who has not yet become a Respondent but who is alleged to have committed an Offense or has Impairment may propose terms of discipline to the Bishop, or the Bishop may propose terms of discipline to the Respondent or such Minister in Leadership. If the Respondent or such Minister in Leadership and the Bishop reach agreement regarding terms of discipline, such terms shall be set forth in a proposed Order. A Minister in Leadership becomes a Respondent by reaching agreement with the Bishop regarding terms of discipline.
Sec. 2 No such proposed Order shall be implemented or shall become effective until it has been approved by the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board. The process of approval or disapproval of a proposed Order shall commence with the Bishop's forwarding the proposed Order to the appropriate Panel of the Board, determined as follows:
(a) If the matter which is the subject of the proposed Order has not previously been submitted to the intake process or if it is pending before the Reference Panel or the Conference Panel, then the proposed Order shall be submitted to the Conference Panel.
(b) If the matter which is the subject of the proposed Order is pending before the Hearing Panel or the Provincial Court of Review, then the proposed Order shall be submitted to the Hearing Panel.
Sec. 3 The Panel to which the proposed Order is submitted shall determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed Order. Regardless of which Panel makes the determination, the means by which the determination shall be made shall be consistent with the procedure provided for Conference Panels under Canon IV.11. In addition to those persons whose attendance is required or permitted under Canon IV.11.4, 5 and 6, the Bishop shall attend the conference, and the Respondent's Advisor and the Chancellor of the diocese may attend the conference.
Sec. 4 The Panel shall approve the proposed Order if the Panel finds that (a) the Respondent is aware of the discipline to be imposed and the effect thereof; (b) the Respondent has had adequate opportunity to consult and seek advice, or has in fact consulted and received advice, from counsel of the Respondent's choosing; and (c) the proposed Order adequately promotes healing, repentance, forgiveness, restitution, justice, amendment of life and reconciliation among the Complainant, Respondent, affected Community and other persons and is otherwise an appropriate resolution of the matter. If the Panel finds that any of the foregoing considerations are not satisfied, the Panel shall disapprove the proposed Order but may make recommendations to the Bishop and the Respondent regarding correction of any deficiencies found. Any revised proposed Order reached between the Bishop and the Respondent shall be resubmitted to the Panel for approval or disapproval.
Sec. 5 Notwithstanding anything in this section to the contrary, if the proposed Order is submitted to the Conference Panel and the matter which is the subject thereof has not been investigated or, in the opinion of the Conference Panel, requires further investigation, the Conference Panel may cause an investigation to be made pursuant to Canon IV.10 before making its determination whether to approve the proposed Order.
Sec. 6 A proposed Order which has been approved by the Panel shall be signed by the Bishop, the Respondent and the president of the Panel, whereupon it shall become an effective Order which shall be implemented as if it were issued by a Hearing Panel and approved by the Bishop, provided, however, that the Respondent shall have no right to appeal the Order or the imposition of any discipline thereunder.
CANON 15: Of Review
Sec. 1 In the event that proceedings before the Hearing Panel are unreasonably delayed or suspended, and are not resumed within sixty days following a written request for resumption of proceedings from the Church Attorney or the Respondent, the Church Attorney or the Respondent may file a written request with the Provincial Court of Review for an order directing the Hearing Panel to resume the proceedings. The Court of Review shall consider the request as follows:
Sec. 2 Within thirty days after issuance of an Order by a Hearing Panel, the Respondent or the Church Attorney may appeal to the Provincial Court of Review, by serving written notice of the appeal upon the Bishop of the diocese, with copies of the notice to the presidents of the Hearing Panel and the Province. The notice of appeal shall be signed by the Respondent's counsel or the Church Attorney, and shall include a copy of the Order from which the appeal is taken and shall state the grounds of the appeal.
Sec. 3 Any Order from a Hearing Panel finding that a Respondent did not commit an Offense involving a question of the Doctrine, Faith or Worship of the Church may be appealed by the Bishop upon the written request of at least two Bishops of other Dioceses within the Province. Such an appeal shall be taken on the question of the Church's Doctrine, Faith and Worship only, and may not seek to reverse the finding of the Hearing Panel of non-commission of other Offenses. An appeal under this section may be taken by service of a notice of appeal by the Bishop upon the Respondent, the Church Attorney and the presidents of the Hearing Panel and the Province within thirty days after the Order of the Hearing Panel is received by the Bishop.
Sec. 4 If an appeal is taken from a Hearing Panel of a diocese which is non-provincial, the appeal shall be taken before the Provincial Court of Review geographically closest to that diocese.
Sec. 5 An appeal shall be heard on the record of the Hearing Panel. The record on appeal may be corrected, if defective, but no new evidence shall be taken by the Provincial Court of Review.
Sec. 6 The standards for and conditions of appeal to the Provincial Court of Review shall be as follows:
Sec. 7 It shall be the duty of the Hearing Panel to produce the record on appeal, consisting of a transcript of the proceedings before the Hearing Panel together with documentary and tangible evidence received by the Hearing Panel. The record shall be printed or otherwise reproduced as authorized by the president of the Provincial Court of Review. Within thirty days after receiving the record on appeal from the Hearing Panel, the party appealing shall serve two copies of the record of appeal, the notice of appeal and the appealing party(s brief, if any, upon the opposite party, and shall deliver five copies to the president of the Provincial Court of Review. Within thirty days after receiving a copy of the record on appeal, the party opposing the appeal shall serve the brief in opposition, if any, upon the appealing party, with five copies to the president of the Provincial Court of Review. Any reply brief of the appealing party shall be served likewise within fifteen days following service of the brief in opposition.
Sec. 8 All members and alternates of the Provincial Court of Review serving for an appeal shall be present for any oral proceedings of the appeal.
Sec. 9 The Provincial Court of Review shall keep a record of all proceedings. The Provincial Court of Review shall appoint a reporter who shall provide for the recording of the proceedings, and who shall serve at the pleasure of the Provincial Court of Review.
Sec. 10 At the hearing of the appeal, the Provincial Court of Review shall afford the Respondent and the Church Attorney the opportunity to be heard. The Provincial Court of Review may regulate the number of counsel to be heard.
Sec. 11 No Order or determination of a Hearing Panel shall be overturned solely for technical or harmless error.
Sec. 12 If, after a notice of appeal has been filed, the appealing party fails to pursue the appeal as provided in this Canon, the Provincial Court of Review may dismiss the appeal.
Sec. 13 Following a hearing of the appeal and private deliberation, the Provincial Court of Review may (a) dismiss the appeal; (b) reverse or affirm in whole or in part the Order of the Hearing Panel; or (c)grant a new hearing before the Hearing Panel.
Sec. 14 The concurrence of a majority of the Provincial Court of Review shall be required to decide an appeal. The Provincial Court of Review shall issue its decision in writing, signed by the members concurring therein, stating its decision and the reasons for the decision. The decision shall be attached to the record. If there is not a concurrence by a majority of the Provincial Court of Review, the Order of the Hearing Panel shall stand as affirmed except for any part of the Order for which there is concurrence.
Sec. 15 Upon determination of the appeal, the president of the Provincial Court of Review shall give notice of the determination in writing to the appealing party, the party in opposition, and to the Bishop and Church Attorney. The appeal record shall be certified by the clerk of the Provincial Court of Review and the president, and shall be delivered to the Bishop along with a copy of the record of appeal from the Hearing Panel.
CANON 16: Of Proceedings Pertaining to Impairment
Sec. 1 Information relating to a Minister in Leadership's physical, emotional, spiritual or mental condition which adversely affects the Minister in Leadership's ability to perform ministerial functions shall be investigated at the instigation of the Intake Officer or Bishop. The Intake Officer shall initiate an appropriate pastoral response and shall forward the information to the Reference Panel.
Sec. 2 Impairment proceedings shall be conducted in the same manner as disciplinary proceedings, except that all of the proceedings shall be confidential. The Panel may take and direct whatever action it deems necessary and proper to determine whether the Minister in Leadership is so impaired, including the examination of the Minister in Leadership by qualified experts designated by the Panel. If, upon due consideration of the matter, the Panel concludes that the Minister in Leadership suffers from Impairment, the Panel shall recommend to the Bishop the issuance of an order transferring the Minister in Leadership to Impairment status for an indefinite period and until further order of the Bishop.
Sec. 3 If it is alleged in the course of a disciplinary proceeding that a Minister in Leadership is unable to participate in the proceeding due to a physical, emotional, spiritual or mental condition, the Panel shall recommend to the Bishop that the Minister in Leadership be transferred to Impairment status pending a determination of the Impairment. If the Panel thereafter determines the claim of inability to defend is valid, the disciplinary proceeding shall be deferred and the Minister in Leadership retained on Impairment status until the Bishop on recommendation from the Panel subsequently considers a request to restore the Minister in Leadership to active status. If the request to restore to active status should be granted, the interrupted disciplinary proceedings may resume. If the Panel determines the claim of incapacity to defend is invalid, the disciplinary proceeding shall resume
Sec. 4 No Minister in Leadership transferred to Impairment status may resume active status except by order of the Bishop. Any Minister in Leadership transferred to Impairment status shall be entitled to request the Discipline and Fitness Board for transfer to active status once a year, or at whatever shorter intervals the Discipline and Fitness Board may direct. Proceedings on a request for transfer to active status shall be conducted in the same manner as disciplinary proceedings, except that all of the proceedings shall be confidential. The Panel shall conduct an investigation and proceedings to determine whether the Impairment has been removed, including a direction for an examination of the Minister in Leadership by qualified experts designated by the Panel. In its discretion, the Panel may direct that the expense of the examination be paid by the Minister in Leadership. The Minister in Leadership making the request for reinstatement to active status shall be required to disclose the name of each health care provider, spiritual director, hospital or other institution by whom or in which the Minister in Leadership has been examined or treated related to the Impairment since the transfer to Impairment status. The Minister in Leadership shall provide to the Panel a written consent to each listed provider to divulge information and records relating to the Impairment if requested by the Panel or the Panel's appointed experts. The Panel shall recommend to the Bishop approval of the request for transfer to active status upon a showing by a preponderance of the evidence that the Impairment has been removed.
Sec. 5 Determinations of Impairment under Canon IV.16 shall have applicability only to proceedings under this Title and shall not have applicability to issues of disability in any other context, including, but not limited to, contexts involving disability insurance or disability benefits from the Church Pension Fund or any other provider of benefits.
CANON 17: Of Proceedings for Bishops
Sec. 1 Except as otherwise provided in this canon, the provisions of this Title shall apply to all matters in which a Member of the Clergy who is subject to proceedings is a bishop.
Sec. 2 In all matters in which the Member of the Clergy who is subject to proceedings is a bishop, the following terms used in Canons IV.5 through IV.16 and Canons IV.18 and IV.19 shall have the following respective meanings:
Sec. 3 The Discipline and Fitness Board for Bishops is hereby established as a court of this Church to have original jurisdiction over matters of discipline of bishops and over matters of bishops' Impairment, to hear bishops' appeals from imposition of restriction on Ministry or placement on Administrative Leave and to determine venue issues as provided in Canon IV.19.5. The Discipline and Fitness Board for Bishops shall consist of ten bishops elected at any regularly scheduled meeting of the House of Bishops, and four priests or deacons and four lay persons appointed by the President of the House of Deputies with the concurrence of the Executive Council. Of members who are priests or deacons, the majority shall be priests. All lay persons appointed to serve shall be confirmed adult communicants in good standing. Members of the Board shall serve staggered terms, with full terms of six years.
Sec. 4 Within sixty days following each General Convention, the Board shall convene to elect a president for the following triennium. The president shall be a Bishop. If there is no president, the bishop who is senior by consecration shall perform the duties of the president.
Sec. 5 The Conference Panel shall consist of three bishops, one priest or deacon and one lay person. The Hearing Panel shall consist of three bishops, one priest or deacon and one lay person, except that the Hearing Panel for the Offense specified in Canon IV.4.1(s)(1) pertaining to Doctrine Offenses shall consist of five bishops only.
Sec. 6 The provisions of Canons IV.13.1(d) and IV.13.6(d) pertaining to recommendations that a Respondent be suspended or deposed from Ministry shall not apply where the Respondent is a bishop. Where the Respondent is a bishop, a Covenant or Order may provide for the suspension or deposition of the Respondent. In such event, the Sentence of suspension or deposition shall be pronounced by the president of the Discipline and Fitness Board for Bishops. The president shall have no discretion to decline to pronounce the Sentence or to pronounce a lesser Sentence. Where a Covenant provides for the suspension or deposition of a Respondent who is a bishop, the president shall pronounce Sentence within thirty days after the date on which the Conciliator or the president signs the Covenant. Where an Order provides for the suspension or deposition of a Respondent who is a bishop, the president shall pronounce Sentence not sooner than thirty days following the issuance of the Order and not later than sixty days following the issuance of the Order. Notwithstanding anything in this section to the contrary, no Sentence shall be pronounced while an appeal of the matter is pending. However, the president may, while an appeal is pending, place restrictions upon the exercise of the Respondent's Ministry, or place the Respondent on Administrative Leave, or continue any such restriction or Administrative Leave as was in effect at the time of the issuance of the Order.
Sec. 7 Notwithstanding any provision of this Title to the contrary, no proceeding shall be brought under this Title against a Bishop in which the Offense alleged is violation of Canon IV.4.1(s)(1) for holding and teaching, or having held and taught, publicly or privately, and advisedly, any Doctrine contrary to that held by this Church unless a statement of disassociation shall have first been issued by the House of Bishops as provided in Canon IV.17.7 (a) and thereafter the consent of one-third of the Bishops qualified to vote in the House of Bishops has been received to initiate proceedings under this Title as provided in Canon IV.17.7 (b).
Sec. 8 The Court of Review for Bishops is hereby established as a court of this Church to have jurisdiction to hear appeals from Hearing Panels of the Discipline and Fitness Board for Bishops.
CANON 18: Of Modification and Remission of Orders
Sec. 1 Any Minister in Leadership who is the subject of an Order which has become effective may apply to the Bishop of the Diocese from which the Order issued, or the Presiding Bishop in the case of a Bishop, for modification or remission of the Order. If the Bishop is satisfied that sufficient reasons exist for granting the modification or remission sought, in whole or in part, the procedures provided in this Canon for modification or remission shall apply.
Sec. 2 In the case of an Order pertaining to any Minister in Leadership other than a Bishop, any provision of any Order other than a provision deposing a Member of Clergy from Ministry may be modified or remitted by the Bishop of the Diocese from which the Order issued with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the members of the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board.
Sec. 3 In the case of an Order deposing a Member of the Clergy other than a Bishop, such deposition may be remitted and terminated by the Bishop of the Diocese from which the Order issued only upon the following conditions: (a) the remission shall be done with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the members of the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board of the Diocese from which the Order issued; (b) the proposed remission, with the reasons therefor, shall be submitted to the judgment of five of the Bishops whose Dioceses are nearest to the Diocese from which the Order issued, and the Bishop shall receive in writing from at least four of the Bishops their approval of the remission and their consent thereto; (c) if the person deposed maintains legal residence or canonical residence in a Diocese other than the Diocese from which the Order issued, the proposed remission, with the reasons therefor, shall be submitted to the judgment of the Bishop(s) of the Diocese(s) of legal and canonical residence and such Bishop(s) shall give his or her (or their) written approval of the remission and consent thereto; and (d) before such remission, the Bishop shall require the person deposed, who desires to be restored to the ordained Ministry, to subscribe to the declaration required in Article VIII of the Constitution.
Sec. 4 In the case of an Order pertaining to a Bishop, any provision of the Order may be modified or remitted by the president of the Discipline and Fitness Board for Bishops with the advice and consent of a majority of the members of the Board and the Bishops who are then serving on any Provincial Court of Review.
Sec. 5 In the case of any Order deposing a Member of the Clergy for abandoning the Communion of this Church, no application for remission shall be received by the Bishop until the deposed person has lived in lay communion with this Church for not less than one year next preceding application for the remission.
Sec. 6 No Order may be modified or remitted unless the Minister in Leadership, the Church Attorney and each Complainant have been afforded sufficient opportunity to be heard by the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board, or the Discipline and Fitness for Ministry Board together with the Bishops who are then serving on any Provincial Court of review, as the case may be, as to why the proposed modification or remission should or should not be permitted.
CANON 19: Of General Provision
Sec. 1 Proceedings under this Title are neither civil nor criminal but ecclesiastical in nature. These proceedings represent the responsibility of this Church to determine who shall serve as Ministers in Leadership of this Church, reflecting the polity and order of this hierarchical church. Ministers in Leadership have voluntarily sought and accepted positions in this Church and have thereby given their consent to subject themselves to the Discipline of this Church. They may not claim in proceedings under this Title constitutional guarantees otherwise associated with secular court proceedings.
Sec. 2 No member of this Church, whether lay or ordained, may seek to have the Constitution and Canons of this Church interpreted by a secular court, or resort to a secular court to address a dispute arising under the Constitution and Canons, or for any purpose of delay, hindrance, review or otherwise affecting any proceeding under this Title.
Sec. 3 No secular court shall have authority to review, annul, reverse, restrain or otherwise delay any proceeding under this Title. No action shall be brought in any secular court to enforce the terms or provisions of any Covenant or Order unless otherwise expressly provided therein.
Sec. 4 There shall be no period of limitation beyond which a Minister in Leadership may no longer be subject to proceedings under this Title. However, a Respondent may assert unreasonable or undue delay as a defense to proceedings under this Title as follows:
Sec. 5 Jurisdiction and venue for proceedings under this Title shall be as follows:
Sec. 6 For purposes of this section, the canonical residence of a lay person shall be (a) the diocese in which the parish, mission or other Community which is the lay person's principal place of Worship in this Church is located, or (b) if the lay person has no such principal place of Worship, the diocese in which the lay person's principal residence is located.
Sec. 7 In any proceeding under this Title in which the Respondent fails to appear before the Conference Panel as required by Canon IV.11.4 or to timely file with the Hearing Panel the written response required by Canon IV.12.2(c), such Panel may proceed in the absence of the Respondent and may accept as true the matters described in the notice issued to the Respondent pursuant to Canons IV.11.3 or IV.12.2.
Sec. 8 In computing any period of time for proceedings described in this Title, the day of the act or event from which the designated time period begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the time period shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday in that jurisdiction, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday in that jurisdiction. Whenever a party has the right or is required to do an act within a prescribed period after the service of notice or other paper, if the service is by mail, five days shall be added to the prescribed period. Whenever it is provided in this Title that an act be done promptly, such act shall be done as quickly as is reasonably possible under the circumstances.
Sec. 9 In all cases in this Title where an action is performed or power exercised by a canonical body consisting of several members, including Reference Panels, Conference Panels, Hearing Panels and Courts of Review, and the full membership has been notified to convene, a majority of the members of the body shall be a quorum; and a majority of the members present when a quorum exists shall be competent to act.
Sec. 10 Each Diocese shall make provision for Advisors to be available to Respondents and Complainants as provided in this canon for the purposes of support, assistance, consultation and advice regarding the process provided in this Title and the rights, responsibilities, consequences and alternatives pertaining thereto.
Sec. 11 No person subject to the authority of this Church may attempt to coerce or improperly influence, directly or indirectly, the actions of any body performing functions under this Title, or any member of such body or any other person involved in such proceedings.
Sec. 12 In all proceedings under this Title whenever a Respondent or a Complainant is required or permitted to appear or to participate or to be heard or to be present, they each shall have the right to be accompanied by and to be represented by counsel of their choice. Whenever any notice or other document is provided to or served upon a Respondent or a Complainant under this Title, such shall also simultaneously be provided to or served upon their respective counsel, if known. Nothing in this Title shall be construed as requiring any Respondent to be represented by counsel. Anything in this Title required or permitted to be done by the Respondent's counsel may be done by the Respondent personally.
Sec. 13 Proceedings under this Title, other than pastoral responses, shall be barred to the extent that the specific Offense or manifestation of Impairment has been the subject of any prior proceeding under this Title against the same Minister in Leadership which resulted in an Order or Covenant. Additionally, in the case of a Member of the Clergy who has been the subject of proceedings under any predecessor to this Title, proceedings under this Title, other than pastoral responses, shall be barred to the extent that the specific Offense or manifestation of Impairment was previously included in a presentment against the Member of the Clergy or was expressly set forth in the Member of the Clergy's waiver and voluntary submission to discipline upon which a Sentence was been pronounced or in the report of a conciliator.
Sec. 14 Impartiality of officials and bodies described in this Title shall be addressed as follows:
Sec. 15 There shall be a presumption that the Respondent did not commit the Offense and does not have Impairment. The standard of proof required to find an Offense by a Respondent shall be that of a preponderance of the evidence.
Sec. 16 In all matters under this Title, it shall be the burden of the Church through the Church Attorney to establish an Offense or Impairment by any Respondent.
Sec. 17 Except as otherwise provided in this Title, it shall be the duty of all members of this Church to appear and testify or respond when duly served with a notice to do so from any Panel in any matter arising under this Title.
Sec. 18 No Chancellor or Vice Chancellor of a Diocese shall serve as Church Attorney in that Diocese. No Chancellor or Vice Chancellor of any Province shall serve as Church Attorney in any Diocese of that Province or any provincial proceeding. The Presiding Bishop's Chancellor shall not serve as Church Attorney in any proceeding. The Church Attorney in any proceeding shall not be from the same law firm as any Chancellor or Vice Chancellor otherwise disqualified under this section.
Sec. 19 Notices or other papers to be served according to procedures of this Title shall be deemed to have been duly served if a copy is delivered to the person to be served, is left with an adult resident of the abode of the person to be served, or is mailed by certified mail to the person's usual place of abode. Notice by publication shall be made in a newspaper of general circulation in the jurisdiction of the person's usual place of abode. Acceptance of service renders unnecessary any further process.
Sec. 20 A reference in this Title to a bishop intending to mean bishop with jurisdiction pursuant to Article II of the Constitution of this Church, shall include a bishop coadjutor if specific jurisdiction for matters contemplated by this Title has been assigned to the bishop coadjutor pursuant to Canon III.19.1(c).
Sec. 21 A Hearing Panel or Court of Review may in its discretion obtain legal counsel to give it opinions on any questions of law, procedure or evidence. Such legal counsel, if any, shall have no vote in any proceeding before the Hearing Panel or Court of Review.
Sec. 22 Except as expressly provided in this Title, applicable Diocesan canon, or in any Covenant or Order, all costs, expenses and fees shall be the obligation of the party, person or entity incurring them.