The editorial on the proposals regarding Canon III.8.1 [TLC, Aug. 6] is somewhat misleading. It states: "Adoption of the proposed canon ... would mean that the Episcopal Church no longer tolerates a theological position recognized in nearly every province of the Anglican Communion."

The committee on that canon was very clear that it was not proposing to police theological views. Among the recommendations is a resolution prohibiting discrimination on such grounds.

What the committee proposals do is circumscribe behavior. No more segregation. No more "males only" lunch counters, altars or pulpits. The bishops who oppose the ordination of women need not resign or violate their consciences. They may choose other bishops to act for them. They may use conscience as a shield. What they may not do is use it as a sword.

Let us not forget that they were not compelled to accept ordination to the episcopate. They voluntarily vowed to conform to the doctrine, discipline and worship of the church. If they really believe that conscience compels them to violate their ordination vows, then one assumes they will embrace the penalties. However, that seems rather extreme.

To suggest that the committee proposals are somehow "exclusive" is simply untrue. Those who oppose the ordination of women are not excluded from the life, worship and governance of the church by these proposals. They are simply prohibited from using conscience as a weapon while exercising positions, ministries and offices of special trust.

(The Rev.) Carol Cole Flanagan

Ellicott City, Md.