Let me express my appreciation for the dual and well expressed Viewpoint articles by Fr. Harris and Ms. Knippers [TLC, June 25].

Even with this well done, reasoned presentation, there remains the questions, What is meant by the word "diocese" for accepting this resolution? Secondly, What position may a parish, and the rector as priest and pastor, take when confronted with a difference in conflict with the position of the diocese?

Who and what is meant by the "diocese" to "...determine the resolution of issues related to same-sex blessings and homosexual ordinations"? Is it to be the bishop? The bishop and standing committee? The bishop and council, if there be one in the diocese? Or shall it be the bishop, with priest and lay members in diocesan convention? The answer to this question not only portends of chaos and confusion within a diocese, but also from diocese to dioceses.

In reality the decision regarding these matters will be with the local parish and rector, responding to requests from members of the congregation for such "blessings" or seeking the approval of rector and vestry for process to ordination. With the divided minds and feeling in the church today, no matter the decision of the rector, with or without agreeing with the "diocese," there will be divided support from the members of the parish regarding his decisions. As a priest there is only one choice to make, the decision from his own conscience, and his convictions regarding the doctrine, discipline and worship as he understands their meaning for the priesthood.

(The Rev.) Tracy Lamar

Blowing Rock, N.C.