As clergy, each of whom has been canonically resident in the Diocese of New Jersey for more than 30 years, we take exception to the description of our diocese in an editorial [TLC, April 11].

The editorial claims that long before the election of Bishop Doss the diocese was beset by congregationalism, lack of vision, clericalism, lack of accountability, divisions run rampant, ineffective diocesan leaderships and other problems too numerous to mention.

We have lived and ministered in this diocese for decades and we beg to differ. These were not problems in the past and for the most part were not the real problems during Bishop Doss's tenure. Rather, they are false allegations put forward as a smoke screen to deflect attention and shift blame away from the inadequate leadership of Bishop Doss.

Bishop Albert Van Duzer (1973-1982) guided the diocese through the controversies of women ordination of women and prayer book revision with uncommon grace and pastoral skill. He also raised millions of dollars with a remarkable Venture in Mission campaign. Bishop Mellick Belshaw (1983-1994) continued in the same vein.

We also disagree with the recommendation that the standing committee and diocesan council resign en masse. Why should they? The last two diocesan conventions have given overwhelming votes of confidence to them and to their request for the bishop's resignation. They understand full well what our diocese needs, and we are confident that they will continue to lead courageously and successfully in the days ahead.

The Revs. James E. Purdy, Edward Daley, Robert E. Sullivan, Jr., William V. Rauscher, Bruce A. Weatherly, William H. Paul, Laurence D. Fish, Elmer L. Sullivan, Frank K. Jago, Alan K. Salmon, Dudley D. Pendleton, Harry N. Collins, W. Kenneth Gorman, John R. Neilson, Gilbert D. Martin, Jr., J. Wesley Vanaman, Edwin R. Sumner, Jr.